The Geography of Personality
Certain regional stereotypes have long since become cliches: The stressed-out
New Yorker. The laid-back Californian.
But the conscientious Floridian? The neurotic Kentuckian?
Even after controlling for variables such as race, income and education levels,
a state's dominant personality turns out to be strongly linked to certain
outcomes. Amiable states, like Minnesota, tend to be lower in crime. Dutiful
states -- an eclectic bunch that includes New Mexico, North Carolina and Utah --
produce a disproportionate share of mathematicians. States that rank high in
openness to new ideas are quite creative, as measured by per-capita patent
production. But they're also high-crime and a bit aloof. Apparently,
Californians don't much like socializing, the research suggests.
As for high-anxiety states, that group includes not just Type A New York and New
Jersey, but also states stressed by poverty, such as West Virginia and
Mississippi. As a group, these neurotic states tend to have higher rates of
heart disease and lower life expectancy.
Lead researcher Peter Jason Rentfrow, lecturer at the University of Cambridge in
England, said he was startled to find such correlations. "That just blew me
away," he said.
Psychologists unaffiliated with the study say it's intriguing but limited.
There's no way to unravel the chicken-and-egg question: Do states tend to
nurture specific personalities because of their histories, cultures, even
climates? Or do Americans, seeking kindred spirits, migrate to the states where
they feel at home? Maybe both forces are at work -- but in what balance?
Another issue: The personality maps may reinforce stereotypes and tempt us to
draw overly simplistic conclusions, said Toni Schmader, a psychologist at the
University of Arizona. Knowing Arizona ranks low in neuroticism, Ms. Schmader
said, she might conclude that sunny weather makes for sunny dispositions. But if
the data had turned out the other way, the sun could just as easily be blamed
for high neuroticism -- for driving Arizonans stir crazy by keeping them cooped
up in air conditioning.
"We tend to reject information that doesn't agree with our stereotypes," Ms.
Schmader said.
Cross-cultural psychology was all the rage in the 1930s and 1940s, driven by a
craze among anthropologists for comparing child-rearing practices in modern and
pre-industrial societies. But the discipline fell out of favor, partly because
of concerns that the comparisons were driven more by value judgments than
standardized assessments.
In the past decade, the field has been reinvigorated by the development of a
44-question personality test that evaluates five traits: extraversion,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism and openness. Some psychologists
disagree with this matrix; others would add traits such as honesty. But the
assessment, called the Big Five Inventory, has been widely used in scientific
research.
Mr. Rentfrow came to the field full of questions gleaned from a life spent
hop-scotching across America. Why were his neighbors in Texas so relaxed, so
courteous, so obsessed with sports? Why did New Yorkers seem so tense and
inward-focused, often brusque to the point of rudeness?
Eager to dig deeper, Mr. Rentfrow turned to a huge collection of psychological
tests administered online from 1999 to 2005.
The assessments were linked to each respondent's current residence, so there was
no way to tell if a New Yorker was a New Yorker born and bred, or had just moved
from Kansas. But that suited Mr. Rentfrow's purposes. He wasn't trying to gauge
how life in New York had shaped any one individual. His goal was a psychological
snapshot of the state, and for that he needed to include even recent migrants --
who may, after all, have been drawn to New York because the big-city bustle
suited their personality.
Mr. Rentfrow said his sample was proportionate to the U.S. population by state
and race. Though it underrepresented the extremes of poor and rich, that
shouldn't skew the results, he said.
While the findings broadly uphold regional stereotypes, there are more than a
few surprises. The flinty pragmatists of New England? They're not as dutiful as
they may seem, ranking at the bottom of the "conscientious" scale. High scores
for openness to new ideas strongly correlates to liberal social values and
Democratic voting habits. But three of the top ten "open" states -- Nevada,
Colorado and Virginia -- traditionally vote Republican in presidential politics.
(All three are prime battlegrounds this election.)
And what of the unexpected finding that North Dakota is the most outgoing state
in the union? Yes, North Dakota, the same state memorialized years ago in the
movie "Fargo" as a frozen wasteland of taciturn souls. Turns out you can be a
laconic extrovert, at least in the world of psychology. The trait is defined in
part by strong social networks and tight community bonds, which are
characteristic of small towns across the Great Plains. (Though not, apparently,
small towns in New England, which ranks quite low on the extraversion scale.)
The findings pleased Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman, who said it was nice to have
scientific proof that his state is super-friendly. "That's the Nebraska I know,"
he said.
But Las Vegas Mayor Oscar B. Goodman can't understand how Nevada got ranked so
low in agreeableness. "We're probably the most agreeable folks in the world,
because we have to treat visitors with a great deal of kindness ... to get a big
tip," he said.
In Florida, meanwhile, tourism official Dia Kuykendall groped to explain her
state's high "conscientious" ranking. She was having trouble reconciling that
with, say, the party scene on Miami Beach. "Conscientious of how they look?" she
wondered.
The research did give Ms. Kuykendall an idea for a new Florida tourism pitch:
"Come visit us, we're not neurotic!"
Social scientists suggest other applications for the research as well. In the
Northeast "stress belt," health officials might consider programs to help folks
relax. In the Midwest, a dutiful state like Kansas might look to woo more
innovative personalities, perhaps by nurturing an artists' enclave or
encouraging young chefs to start restaurants, said Richard Florida, an economic
development analyst who has written extensively on geography and psychology.
"Most cities are still trapped in the idea that they can recruit a call center
or build a big stadium" to spur revitalization, Mr. Florida said. "This is a big
wake-up call for policy makers."
It's also a wake-up call for proud residents of the great state of wherever --
some of whom aren't fond of the findings. Mr. Rentfrow said he's had to help
some of them feel better. Yes, North Dakota and Wyoming rank quite low in
openness to new ideas. But why label them narrow-minded and insular? Say,
instead, he suggests, that they value tradition. New York may be neurotic, but
he offers another way to put it: "It's a state in touch with its feelings."
Or take a cue from Ted Ownby, who studies Southern culture at the University of
Mississippi. His state came up highly neurotic -- and he suspects his neighbors
would be proud.
"Here in the home of William Faulkner," Mr. Ownby said, "we take intense, almost
perverse neuroticism as a sign of emotional depth."
Write to
Stephanie Simon at
stephanie.simon@wsj.com